What a difference three years makes. The first primary debates showed us just how far the Democrats have drifted on Second Amendment rights. Anti-gun politicians were once coy about their goals—that’s not so true today. President Barack Obama told PBS’s Gwen Ifill during a town hall in 2016, “And at no point have I ever, ever proposed confiscating guns from responsible gun owners. So it’s just not true.” Now the presumed front-runner, former Vice President Joe Biden has put the entire firearms manufacturing industry in his crosshairs. “Our enemy is the gun manufacturers, not the NRA, the gun manufacturers,” Biden said.
Not a single candidate on the stage denounced the comment. Their silence is tacit agreement. Every Democratic candidate is now gunning for an industry that supports 312,000 jobs earning $15.7 billion in wages and has a total economic impact over $52 billion. The firearms industry is an integral contributor to our economy, having paid more than $6.8 billion in total taxes in 2019 alone.
New Zealand is attempting confiscation now and just 37 of 1.2 million semiautomatic firearms were surrendered because gun owners there don’t trust the government to protect them or pay them fair market value.
The firearms industry is the fabric of America. These are American jobs in every corner of the nation. They produce firearms for more than 100 million law-abiding gun owners who use them responsibly for lawful purposes every day, including recreational shooting, hunting and self-defense. Our industry is the “Arsenal of Democracy,” a phrase coined by Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt, supplying the firearms that our armed forces and brave men and women of law enforcement use to protect our nation and keep our communities safe.
Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., is a self-professed gun owner. Yet she, and all other Democratic candidate,s vilify and blame law-abiding gun owners and firearms manufacturers for criminals’ actions. They would make Americans more vulnerable to those who have no respect for the law, property nor life itself.
Overlooked in the back-and-forth, former Vice President Biden also agreed with the far-fetched notion of mass confiscation of firearms, a plan first proposed by Congressman Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., who is also a candidate for president. Biden said, “I would buy back those weapons.”
In fact, not a single person on the stage pushed back against Swalwell’s confiscation plan, a forced surrender under threat of criminal penalty of more than 16 million modern sporting rifles. Swalwell would do this with tax money paid by these gun owners. He once infamously threatened to respond to noncompliance with nuclear weapons.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., defended firearms confiscation as legal. “That’s not confiscation,” she said. “You would give them the offer to buy back the gun” — the proverbial offer you can’t refuse.
New Zealand is attempting confiscation now and just 37 of 1.2 million semiautomatic firearms were surrendered because gun owners there don’t trust the government to protect them or pay them fair market value.
Biden’s firearms industry animus went further. He would bar all firearms sales, except those equipped with “biometric” authorized-user technology. “No gun should be able to be sold unless your biometric measure could pull that trigger,” he explained.
Today’s reality is that each and every Democratic candidate views firearms ownership as unacceptable and the industry as an enemy.
Biden was previously named by President Barack Obama in 2012 to lead a gun control task force that proposed 23 executive actions, including exploring “gun safety technologies.” The National Institutes of Justice studied technology to “unlock” guns and after investing $12.6 million for research over 15 years, “none were successful.”
In fact, a recent survey found just five percent of gun buyers would consider buying a “smart-gun.” A further 70 percent said they would never consider it for fear of failure when it’s needed most. A gun, especially when used to defend lives, must work as intended without fail or flaw. Such technology simply doesn’t yet exist.
In the wake of the Newtown, Conn., tragedy, the National Shooting Sports Foundation’s President and CEO Steve Sanetti met with Vice President Biden who singled out NSSF’s Project Childsafe program that has distributed over 38 million free gun safety kits including gun locks through 15,000 police agencies in every U.S. state and territory.
He said then, “You guys are doing a lot of good things, including the gun lock thing, and this isn’t just Joe Biden blowing smoke. I mean it.”
Three years ago, the ideas being debated as possible national firearms policy were dismissed as absurd. Today’s reality is that each and every Democratic candidate views firearms ownership as unacceptable and the industry as an enemy. The lines are clearly drawn.
Do you agree with Larry Keane’s assessment of the Democrat’s position on the Second Amendment? Why or why not? Share your answer in the comment section.
Lawrence G. Keane is the Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Government and Public Affairs for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearms industry trade association.
Sign up for K-Var’s weekly newsletter and discounts here.
Anybody who says the Anti Gun people do NOT want to take our guns is either lying, or stupid! All you have to do, is go to the base core values or Mission Statements of ANY of the Anti Gun organizations, and, if you look, you’ll find that they, or their parent organizations DO want total gun confiscation, and some of them do not even want our military or police to have guns! C’mon, don’t piss down the back of our necks, and try to tell us it’s raining…
Jesse – most of them do not want “total confiscation” – they want to confiscate them from free Citizens (us deplorables) as that needs to happen so their minions – who WILL be armed – can enforce their will on us. If those minions are also disarmed they will be hard put to force us into the fema camps or wherever else they try to put us.
Moronic Joe is a moron and will always be a moron. Going after the gun manufactures and making them responsible for someone else. Does that mean if someone is killed by a Ford we are going to hold Ford Motor Corp responsible, why not, it was there vehicle. More people are killed in auto accidents, than they will ever be killed by guns. There isn’t a liberal commie democrat politician alive in this here U.S. that doesn’t want to confiscate your guns. Just about every candidate running on the Democratic side for president is a socialist/communist. They can’t fundamentally change America to Obama’s America unless they take the guns first. Take the guns, and there is no resistance. Look at every communist country. The took the guns first. Stalin (FDR’s uncle Joe) killed 35 million of his own people in the name of communism. Stalin was a ,mass murderer. Every law abiding gun owner should one at least one AR-15. The liberal commie Democrats keep preaching it has no use except for killing people. That’s exactly right. Mine stays in the Closet, it doesn’t get used, and it depends on who is being killed. If the liberal commie democrats want to confiscate the guns, and bring on a 2nd American revolution, there is your answer.
Ox – some 30 to 40 years ago there was a big push for “vicarious liability” – by liars I mean lawyers that would have caused exactly the scenario you described with Ford. Fortunately overall cooler heads prevailed which ultimately led to good legislation such as the PLCAA. But of course there are still lawfare attempts being made – think the Sandy Hook lawsuits as a classic example. The left will NEVER give up trying to attain power and keep it – at any cost.
BTW, I heard that some 78,000 victims died of opioid abuse last year – where is the outcry over that?
I think a march on Washington is needed. It’s very doable to get at least 250,000 gun owners at the National mall.
At the very least, it would show that we are tired of this bullspit! Hell, I would even use my vacation time to do this.
I honestly don’t give a runny crap what the Dems (or anyone else) proposes to ‘do about guns’. Mine will go nowhere, and will only be confiscated by killing me. Most are already buried with ammo, and each with only one trusted person knowing where – in case they ever decide they need a gun – like after commie feds kill me to try to get mine. Guns for the future generations is my legacy.
Yes, the government is coming for your guns if the democrats win. They say that California is the leader in trends. They have all but outlawed modern sporting rifles. We do not want their trends though.