Over the decades, I have researched handguns and used the terms practical accuracy, intrinsic accuracy, and absolute accuracy. Firing from the benchrest is important and always interesting. However, absolute accuracy isn’t as important as the practical accuracy we may coax from a handgun.
I think handgunners don’t take accuracy as serious as riflemen. Perhaps, most cannot shoot well enough to take advantage of the accuracy in a superbly-accurate handgun, so they don’t bother. Competition seems to place a premium on speed rather than accuracy. In personal defense, the balance of speed and accuracy is important. If you don’t think accuracy is important in personal defense, we have been to a different church.
Shot placement is accuracy. The standard of measuring accuracy has come to be a five-shot group at 25 yards. This is fired from a solid braced position from a bench. I use the Bullshooter pistol rest to remove as many human factors as possible. There is some compromise with shorter barrel or lightweight handguns, so they are tested at 15 yards.
The quality of the handgun, fitting of the slide, quality of the rifling, sights (whether fine for target shooting or broad for fast results at combat range) are very important. The quality of the trigger press is important. The shooter is the most important part of the equation. There are those who may state that such testing of handguns is irrelevant, as personal defense use almost always demands firing at less than 10 yards. There is much validity to this argument. Not that combat shooting, drawing and firing and making a center hit, are not difficult.
It may be reasonable to test an 8 3/8-inch barreled magnum at an even 100 yards, but a personal defense handgun with few exceptions will never be used past 10 yards. Just the same, those of us who test handguns like to take them to the Nth degree and test the firearm’s accuracy. It is an interesting pursuit that is rewarding although there is some frustration in the beginning.
Service pistols, high-end pistols, and revolvers have different levels of accuracy. A revolver with five, six, seven or eight chambers that rotate to line up with the barrel for each shot is more accurate than it should be. As an example, the Colt Official Police .38 and the Smith and Wesson K 38 are each capable of putting five shots into 2.2 to 2.5 inches at 25 yards with Federal Match ammunition. This is excellent target accuracy.
When cops qualified with revolvers at 50 yards, these handguns were up to the task. The Colt Python is easily the most accurate revolver I have tested and perhaps the most accurate handgun of any type. At a long 25 yards, I fired a 15/16-inch group with the Federal 148-grain MATCH in .38 Special. This involved tremendous concentration and frankly it was exhausting.
I have fired a similar group with the SIG P220, but this was unusual. The SIG will usually do 1.25-inch with the Federal 230-grain MATCH loading. The Python will group very nearly as well with full power magnum loads. The Federal 180-grain JHP .357 Magnum is good for an inch at 25 yards, as an example. A much less expensive revolver that is superbly accurate and nearly as accurate as the Python? The four-inch barrel Ruger GP100 is good for groups about 90% as good as the Python. It is also more rugged.
1911 models, however, are quite another story. As I have seen with many 1911 handguns, you pay a lot for the last degree of accuracy. In self-loaders, the Les Baer Concept VI is a solid three-inch gun at 50 yards. The SIG P220, I mentioned, may not run a combat course as quickly as a 1911 handgun, but it will prove more accurate than all but the finest custom guns. The Nighthawk Falcon is a well-made and reliable handgun worth its price. I am surprised when it fires a group larger than 2.0 inches at 25 yards with quality ammunition.
The Guncrafter Commander, with No Name, is among the most accurate 1911 handguns of any type I have tested. So far, the single most accurate loading has been the Fiocchi 200-grain XTP with a 25-yard 1.4-inch group. This takes a great deal of concentration to achieve. However, this pistol is among the most accurate of handguns in offhand fire as well. Firing off hand at known and unknown ranges, the pistol is surprisingly accurate.
When it comes to modern handguns it is interesting that there seems to be a race in both directions—to the top and to the bottom. Makers are attempting to manufacture the least expensive handgun possible that works. Someone buys it, and some of the handguns, such as the Ruger LC9/EDC types, are reliable and useful defensive handguns.
The same is true of revolvers. Even the inexpensive Taurus 450 .45 caliber revolver I often carry hiking will place five shots into less than two inches at 15 yards, reasonable for a revolver with a ported two-inch barrel. I am unimpressed with the accuracy of many of the polymer-framed striker-fired handguns. I think that they are accurate enough and no more, but the trigger and sights are probably the limiting factory. Almost all fire five shots of service grade ammunition into 2.5 to 3.0 inches at 25 yards.
High-end handguns such as the Dan Wesson Heritage and Springfield Operator are more accurate than the majority of factory handguns of a generation ago. As an example, 39 years ago, I convinced the lead instructor and range master to allow some of us to carry to the 1911 .45. I barely managed to qualify with the Colt Commander Series 70 as qualification included barricade fire at 50 yards. With factory ammunition of the day, the pistol would not group into 10 inches at 50 yards, the military standard for 1911 handguns. Using a 200-grain SWC handload, the pistol grouped into eight inches at 50 yards, and I barely made the cut.
The sights were small, the was trigger heavy, and the grip’s tang cut my hand after 50 rounds. However, the pistol was reliable, fast into action, and it was a Colt 1911. Later, I added a Bar Sto barrel and enjoyed much better accuracy. Today, a SIG 1911 Fastback Carry will group five rounds into 2.5 inches on demand at 25 yards and sometimes much less—and it is a factory pistol!
Other handguns are more accurate than most give them credit for. While the SIG P series is regarded as a very accurate handgun, the CZ 75B will give the SIG a run for the money. The CZ 75B is easily handled in off-hand fire and very accurate. The Beretta 92 is also an accurate handgun, as I discovered in instructors’ school when a veteran qualified with the Beretta 92.
As a rule, .40 caliber versions of the 9mm are not as accurate as the 9mm version, but there are exceptions. The SIG P229 in .40 is an accurate and reliable handgun that makes an excellent go-anywhere do-anything handgun. My example will place five rounds of the Fiocchi-180 grain XTP load into 2.0 inches at 25 yards on demand. Accuracy is interesting, but here are other considerations, such as how quickly the pistol may be drawn and placed on target. Control in rapid fire is also important. Reliability is far more important. But accurate handguns are interesting.
Which handgun do/did you own that gave the best accuracy? Which one do you most want to own next? Share your answers in the comment section.
Sign up for K-Var’s weekly newsletter and discounts here.
Most accurate, was a S&W Mod. 14 in .38 Special, with a trigger job and a custom grip with a Tyler “t” grip added. Along with a Wide trigger shoe. 12 rds. in 15 sec. at 7 yds., all in the X ring of a B-27 target
You will be amazed at how your accuracy will improve if you use a laser.
Lasers show you all your faults as the spot moves if you jerk the trigger, anticipate recoil, or even breathe wrong.
Lasers also allow hitting accurately at much longer distances when shooting indoors or outside on cloudy days.
Smith & Wesson 686, 6 inch barrel in 38/357 mag. All stock right out of the box except for the Pachmeyer presentation grips. Sweetest trigger in the vault. It is too big for every day carry, but perfect as a brush gun over rough terrain. I carry it in a cross draw holster so I can have both hands to walk and climb. Not as accurate with it as I am with my henry lever gun, but a whole lot easier to carry and it is indestructible. Clean it up and it looks just like it did when it came out of the box 30 years ago
The problem is always the man, as far as handguns go. Good proof of this was the old NRA study, I should look it up again myself, looking into the accuracy of 38 Special wadcutter handloads. The old study used many different handguns, including 1911 style target pistols as well as a variety of combat revolvers. Most importantly, they used nothing but bench machines for all their testing, and this is where the results are an important benchmark for concepts of handgun accuracy testing:
With the worst of bullets and too much powder, accuracy in the bench machines could deteriorate to as much as 6 MOA, or 3 inch at 50 yards and 1.5 inches at 25 yards, and 0.75 inches at 12.5 yards. At best, the best bullets and methods could achieve 3.0 MOA and in the very best selected groups as small as 2.5 MOA! Even at 3, this means 1.5 inches at 50 yards, 0.75 inches at 25 yards, and 0.375 at 12.5 yards. So, when we read about accuracy off a sandbag with handguns in the magazines, we outta take them with heaping spoons of salt. No, most auto loaders they test in the gun magazines with standard ball ammunition are not fine American masterpiece 38 Special revolvers firing carefully hand fitted handloads, but there is a good chance that the stated accuracy has more to do with the shooter than the limitations of the weapon and ammunition.
So, Mr. Campell, your 15/16th group at 25 yards is damned good, and about the limitations of the ammunition and gun, according to the old NRA study. The fact remains that most groups even good handgunners shoot off bags and supports cannot match the machine rest, not nearly as well as rifles can. Without something like a Ransom to help us give us that 99.9% determination, we can easily lose out on our pursuit of greater handgun accuracy due to our own error. A tough road to hoe, indeed.
I have many different handguns that I shoot,and seem to shoot equally well. I do not shoot ften at 25 yds. I see little point in it, since if the bad guy is that far away, I am going the other way,quickly! I have no interest in saving the world etc, just my self and my own if it becomes necessary. Let the wannabes and idiots sling lead back and forth. I will extract myself at every opportunity, and avoid the problem! That being said,I find the two Dan Wesson 1911’s I own, in 9mm and .45acp shoot as well as any firearm I have ever shot,including those costing twice as much. At 10 or 15 yds,they both cut one ragged hole with the entire magazine. Call it what ever you want,but that is accurate to me.