Smugglers Beware
In late October 2024, Robert Mao, a California based firearms enthusiast and legal owner of several Kalashnikov rifles back home, flew to Moscow forwhat should have been a straightforward trip: running a marathon and indulging his passion for AK accessories.
Mao had long collected Kalashnikov pattern rifles stateside, where they’re perfectly legal for civilians. During his visit, he visited the iconic Zenit store on Moscow’s Novy Arbat street, picking up gunsmithing tools and other aftermarket goodies. He also arranged an online purchase of two rifle stocks, one for a classic Kalashnikov and one for a Saiga carbine, paying the unidentified seller via cryptocurrency.
These stocks are classified in Russia as key firearm components. Exporting them without proper permits and declarations is strictly prohibited under Russian customs and criminal law.

Mao Apprehended
On his departure day, Mao checked in for a flight to Istanbul at Vnukovo Airport. He walked through the green customs channel (for nothing to declare) with the parts tucked in his luggage. Russian border guards had other ideas. They spotted the undeclared items, seized them, and arrested him on the spot for attempted smuggling of main firearm parts across the border, Article 226.1 of the Russian Criminal Code.
What followed was a lengthy legal process. Mao initially claimed partial ignorance of the export rules, arguing he viewed the stocks as simple accessories for his legal U.S. collection. Prosecutors saw it differently: intent to export restricted military grade components without paperwork constituted smuggling.
In early 2025, Moscow’s Solntsevsky District Court convicted him and handed down a four-year sentence in a general-regime penal colony. An appeal followed, where Mao fully admitted guilt, expressed remorse, and even took the unusual step of donating the confiscated parts to a Russian military unit fighting in Ukraine (complete with a thank you letter entered into the case file, presumably in hopes of leniency). The appellate court wasn’t swayed. On February 17, 2026, it upheld the original four-year term.
A Warning To Traveling Collectors
The story has sparked online chatter: some see it as a harsh reminder of Russia’s zero tolerance stance on undeclared weapons parts amid heightened security and geopolitical tensions; others view it as a cautionary tale for travelers who assume “it’s just a stock” won’t trigger serious consequences. For Mao, a seemingly routine enthusiast trip turned into years behind bars over components many American collectors take for granted. It’s a stark
illustration of how drastically export controls can differ, even for items that seem innocuous to one side of the border.
Whether viewed as bureaucratic overreach or a necessary enforcement of sovereignty, the case of Robert Mao serves as a reminder: when it comes to firearms and international travel, ignorance (or optimism) about local laws is rarely a winning defense.
Sign up for K-Var’s weekly newsletter and discounts here.

Leave a Reply