• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The K-Var ArmoryThe K-Var Armory

The Largest Supplier of Firearms, Gun Parts, & Accessories Online

  • Shop K-Var
  • News
    • Industry
    • Politics
    • Second Amendment
    • Self Defense
    • Comics
  • Reviews
    • Anything AK
    • Anything AR
    • Gear
    • Pistols
    • Rifles
    • Shotguns
  • Newsletter

Supreme Court Hears Most Significant 2A Case Since Heller

December 3, 2019 by David Dolbee 6 Comments

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in what may be the most significant Second Amendment case in over a decade. The key issue before the court whether, and how far, the right to bear arms extends outside an individual’s home and into the public square. A ruling by the court could lay the groundwork for the most consequential Second Amendment ruling since the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller decision.

U.S. Supreme Court building and stairs
Monday’s argument builds on a framework established by Justice Scalia in 2008. In the Heller decision, the Court ruled that the Second Amendment carved out constitutional protections for firearms uses that abide “traditionally lawful purposes.”

Monday’s argument builds on a framework established by Justice Scalia in 2008. In the Heller decision, the Court ruled that the Second Amendment carved out constitutional protections for firearms uses that abide “traditionally lawful purposes.” The current case was spawned in 2013, and after finally having made its way up to the High Court, challenges New York City’s licensing scheme—one of the most restrictive in the nation. The Court’s ruling could have wide ranging effects on gun laws across the nation.

Current Laws

Currently, New York City requires gun owners to obtain a premise license to legally possess a firearm in the home.

Until recently, guns purchased through a premises license could only be removed from the home, unloaded and in a locked case, in order to be transported for target practice to an approved shooting range. Other specified reasons for transportation had to receive preclearance from the city. New York City has only seven public authorized ranges, and gun owners could not transport their weapons to a second home or range outside city boundaries.

“While this case is about an unusual and limited local rule, it provides an opportunity for the Supreme Court to reaffirm that the Second Amendment leaves ample room for the kinds of reasonable gun safety laws that save lives and that Americans overwhelmingly support,” Eric Tirschwell, litigation director of the gun-control group Everytown for Gun Safety—started by Democratic Presidential hopeful Michael Bloomberg—said in a press release in January.

The History

Lawmakers knew this was an issue hey did not want to go before the Court. To that end, once challenged, the city and state of New York, worked double time to make the issue go away. Essentially, knowing they could not win in court, they tried a sneaky legal maneuver—abolish restrictions forming the basis for the plaintiffs’ objections. The plan was to eliminate the controversy and therefore leave nothing of the complaint for the High Court to rule on. This opened up the draconian laws to allow New York State residents to transport firearms from any place which they have a license for to any place within the state where they are legally allowed to possess the firearm. In other words, New York City residents could transport their firearms to second homes or gun ranges outside city limits, as long as they had satisfied the licensing requirements of their destination’s regulators.

Woman holding an AR-15 wearing a ball cap with USA embroidered and a Trump 2020 logo on her shirt.
The U.S. Supreme Court will likely be more friendly to self-defense proponents than the courts with New York.

This case has twice before been reviewed on appeal. In 2015, a U.S. district court judge ruled against the plaintiffs. The results were much the same, in the City’s favor, in 2018 after an appellate court ruled in favor of New York City. This gave NYC’s governing legislators a fair amount of confidence, due to favorable judges and a Court with a history of supporting anti-Second Amendment legislation. Then the U.S. Supreme agreed to hear the case…

With Justice Scalia on the Court, Second Amendment proponents were hopeful. Now with a staunch opponent regulation in Justice Neil Gorsuch and Kennedy’s seat now filled by Justice Kavanaugh, gun control proponents have went so far as to propose packing the U.S. Supreme Court just to overturn the Second Amendment. However, that is not to say that anything is in the bag. The Court will make its own ruling and no one an truly predict the outcome of any case before the Court.

Newsweek appropriately pointed out:

The plaintiffs are arguing that the text of the Second Amendment—in its provision for keeping and bearing arms—does not square with a gun-ownership scheme that is confined to the home. In fact, the pistol association said in its brief, the word bear makes plain the notion that arms would be utilized “outside the home.”

Their brief argued that gun-ownership traditions in the United States made clear that the Second Amendment would protect “a right to carry a loaded firearm upon one’s person should the need for self-defense arise.” In rattling off restrictions the plaintiffs find burdensome, the brief notes that residents are prohibited under a premises license from carrying weapons outside the home “either openly or concealed.” This hints at the kind of expansive ruling that stakeholders may be holding out for—a broad expansion of concealed-carry and, possibly, open-carry rules.

The NRA aided the suit by the New York Pistol Association early on with a supportive legal brief. The NRA also weighed in recently citing the conduct of New York City with its attempt to have the case dismissed to avoid review:

“The Supreme Court saw through New York City’s blatant attempt to evade judicial review in this important case,” NRA-ILA executive director Jason Ouimet said in a press release after New York unsuccessfully tried to invoke mootness. “This case presents a national opportunity to confirm a simple truth that New York City politicians refuse to accept: Our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is fundamental, and it doesn’t vanish when we exit our homes.”

Conclusion

SCOTUS will go one of two ways of course. The Court has plenty of outs if it chooses to avoid the the looming gun-rights question. However, SCOTUS already had a chance to declare the case moot, which suggests a willingness to go forward—gun owners and supporters of Second Amendment rights can only be hopeful until then.

Do you think the Supreme Court will take up the bigger issue of the Second Amendment and the right to self-defense beyond the home? Share your answers and analysis in the comment section.


Sign up for K-Var’s weekly newsletter and discounts here.

Filed Under: News, Second Amendment Tagged With: District of Columbia v Heller, New York City, Second Amendment, U.S. Supreme Court

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Alan says

    December 6, 2019 at 5:59 pm

    The exist structure of laws, regulations and procedures existent in N.Y.C., where I lived for many years is an affront, not only to constitutional guaratees, but to plain old common sense.

    Reply
  2. Jay Rolf Armstrong says

    December 6, 2019 at 6:00 pm

    Our 2nd Amendment rights to bear arms shall be protected by the feds from State intrusion, SCOTUS will affirm. Regarding federal firearm laws, they are almost all unConstitutional outside of the feds very limited jurisdiction used only for very limited enumerated purposes. Their alleged unConstitutionally created claimed ‘plenary’ authority under the commerce clause is overreaching into our fundamental rights and also unlawful and in fact illegal??

    Reply
  3. KUETSA says

    December 6, 2019 at 7:01 pm

    What I notice is that when the Supreme Court is hearing the first gun rights case in a decade, we suddenly have daily shootings. Coincidence?
    When we were on the verge of concealed carry reciprocity and the hearing protection act, and at the same time the Supreme Court considering hearing the Maryland “assault weapons” and high capacity magazine ban . . . BOOM . . . LAS VEGAS SHOOTING! Coincidence?
    POLL:
    How many out there, if tasked to commit that shooting in Las Vegas, would risk being detected getting into position, smuggling TWENTY SOMETHING RIFLES up to that room? How many would bring more than ONE GOOD RIFLE?
    It’s more likely that Paddock was lured to that room, under the guise of some people who were WAY OUT OF HIS LEAGUE wanting to BUY guns, and he had his “gun store” on display around the room. (Great photo op for gun control after the fact!) [and for all the information that was suppressed, delayed, and withheld about that shooting – THAT PIC WAS OUT FRONT RELEASED IMMEDIATELY!] He wound up being the DEAD PATSY IN THE ROOM. Interesting side note – the FBI refused the ATF access to the firearms to do ballistics tests, very interesting. (And probably unheard of) DEEP STATE BLACK-OP
    It is my opinion that VERY RUTHLESS FORCES in our government feel the NEED to disarm American Citizens. (At least for now, surely the rifles that enable our defending our freedoms)
    With no political power to make it happen, terrorist mass shootings sure work great. Concealed carry reciprocity and the hearing protection act were DEAD after Vegas. The Supreme Court decided against hearing the Maryland case. WE GOT MORE GUN CONTROL
    As this case proceeds, and we get to the Massachusetts “assault weapon” and magazine ban being heard, be on the lookout for something that tops Vegas.

    Reply
    • Zupglick says

      December 6, 2019 at 9:00 pm

      They tried on two Navy bases.

      Reply
  4. pete says

    December 6, 2019 at 7:15 pm

    In the cosmic scope of things, my simple mind just can’t figure out the left is going to curb gun violence in this country by taking guns away from the good guys. It all boils down to that simple.

    Reply
  5. Docduracoat says

    December 7, 2019 at 5:35 pm

    The amazing thing is that 2 different NY courts upheld this law.
    It is such an outrageous infringement to not allow a citizen to transport legally registered, unloaded firearms out of the state.
    The Supremes are going to slap for ignoring the Heller decision

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to the Muzzle Flash – The K-Var Armory Official Newsletter!








Marketing permission: I give my consent to K-Var to be in touch with me via email using the information I have provided in this form for the purpose of news, updates and marketing.

What to expect: If you wish to withdraw your consent and stop hearing from us, simply click the unsubscribe link at the bottom of every email we send or contact us at news@k-var.com. We value and respect your personal data and privacy. To view our privacy policy, please visit our website. By submitting this form, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.


Recent Posts

  • ATF’s “New Era of Reform” – What Does it Mean?
  • Exploring the FIME Group FM-VZ61-01 VZ61 Parts Kit: A Gem for Collectors and Enthusiasts
  • The Vitality of Replacing Parts like Springs and Firing Pins
  • Trump’s 50% Tariff Threat: Impact on Imported Firearm Prices
  • Circle 10 “Waffle Pattern” 30-round Magazine: As Good As it Gets
Gun Broker Auctions

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017

Categories

  • 1911
  • Accessories
  • Ammunition
  • Anything AK
  • Anything AR
  • Arex
  • Arsenal
  • Blades
  • Browning
  • Cartridges
  • Charter Arms
  • Colt
  • Comics
  • Conservation
  • Dan Wesson
  • Deer
  • Derringer
  • Gear
  • Glock
  • Hearing Protection
  • Holsters
  • How To
  • How-To
  • Hunting
  • Industry
  • Kahr
  • Kel-Tec
  • Lasers
  • News
  • NFA
  • Night Vision
  • North American Arms
  • Op-ed
  • Optics
  • Optics
  • Pistols
  • Politics
  • Predator
  • Product Recall Notice
  • Red Dot
  • Reloading
  • Reviews
  • Revolvers
  • Rifles
  • Rimfire
  • Rock Island Armory
  • Rossi
  • Ruger
  • Ruger
  • Savage
  • Second Amendment
  • Self Defense
  • Shotguns
  • SIG Sauer
  • Small Game
  • Smith and Wesson
  • Springfield
  • Tactics
  • Taurus
  • Thermal
  • Turkey
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • Walther
  • Waterfowling
  • Comics
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • About
  • Newsletter

Copyright © 2025 · K-Var Corp · Log in